AI-Studio/app/MindWork AI Studio/Chat/ConversationTokenTracker.cs
Thorsten Sommer d85b4e71b6
Some checks are pending
Build and Release / Determine run mode (push) Waiting to run
Build and Release / Sync Flatpak repo (push) Blocked by required conditions
Build and Release / Collect Flatpak artifacts (push) Blocked by required conditions
Build and Release / Verify (push) Waiting to run
Build and Release / Build app (${{ matrix.dotnet_runtime }}) (-aarch64-apple-darwin, osx-arm64, macos-latest, aarch64-apple-darwin, dmg,app,updater, dmg) (push) Blocked by required conditions
Build and Release / Build app (${{ matrix.dotnet_runtime }}) (-aarch64-pc-windows-msvc.exe, win-arm64, windows-latest, aarch64-pc-windows-msvc, nsis,updater, nsis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
Build and Release / Build app (${{ matrix.dotnet_runtime }}) (-aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu, linux-arm64, ubuntu-22.04-arm, aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu, appimage,updater, appimage) (push) Blocked by required conditions
Build and Release / Build app (${{ matrix.dotnet_runtime }}) (-x86_64-apple-darwin, osx-x64, macos-latest, x86_64-apple-darwin, dmg,app,updater, dmg) (push) Blocked by required conditions
Build and Release / Build app (${{ matrix.dotnet_runtime }}) (-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc.exe, win-x64, windows-latest, x86_64-pc-windows-msvc, nsis,updater, nsis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
Build and Release / Build app (${{ matrix.dotnet_runtime }}) (-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, linux-x64, ubuntu-22.04, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, appimage,updater, appimage) (push) Blocked by required conditions
Build and Release / Prepare & create release (push) Blocked by required conditions
Build and Release / Publish release (push) Blocked by required conditions
Rebuilt how AI Studio knows what a model can do (#960)
2026-09-13 14:17:25 +02:00

172 lines
7.0 KiB
C#

namespace AIStudio.Chat;
/// <summary>
/// Keeps a number up to date which nothing announces.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// A conversation is a plain list of plain objects. Nothing raises an event when a block is added,
/// when a document is attached, or when an answer grows by another sentence -- so a number derived
/// from all of that cannot be wired to the places which change it. It was tried: fifteen call sites,
/// and four review rounds each found another one which was missing.
///
/// So the number is recomputed instead of notified. Whoever thinks something may have changed nudges
/// this tracker, and the tracker decides when to do the work: many nudges in a row become one run, a
/// nudge arriving during a run becomes exactly one further run, and a minimum distance keeps a burst
/// of them from turning into a burst of counting.
///
/// The heartbeat is not distrust of the nudges. Attachments are read from disk every time they are
/// sent, so a file somebody edits in another program changes what the next message costs without
/// anything happening in AI Studio which anyone could nudge from.
/// </remarks>
/// <param name="recount">Does the actual work. Gets a token which ends it when the tracker goes away.</param>
/// <param name="quietTime">
/// How long to stay quiet after a run before honouring the next nudge. Asked again each time,
/// because what is reasonable depends on what is going on: a person who just switched a profile is
/// waiting for the number, while an answer being written moves it with every word and wants a
/// slower pace than the words arrive at.
/// </param>
/// <param name="heartbeat">How long to wait for a nudge before running anyway.</param>
public sealed class ConversationTokenTracker(Func<CancellationToken, Task> recount, Func<TimeSpan> quietTime, TimeSpan heartbeat) : IAsyncDisposable
{
/// <summary>
/// How long a tracker which is going away waits for its own loop.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// The loop ends on cancellation, so this is only ever reached when something it called does
/// not. Whoever is leaving the screen must not be the one who waits for that.
/// </remarks>
private static readonly TimeSpan SHUTDOWN_PATIENCE = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(2);
private readonly SemaphoreSlim wakeUp = new(0, 1);
private readonly CancellationTokenSource stopping = new();
private Task? loop;
/// <summary>
/// Starts the loop. Calling this twice does nothing the second time.
/// </summary>
public void Start() => this.loop ??= Task.Run(this.RunAsync);
/// <summary>
/// Says that something may have changed.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// Cheap on purpose, because it is called from the render path. It says "maybe", never "yes":
/// asking for a run which turns out to change nothing costs a few lookups, while missing one is
/// the bug this whole class exists to make impossible.
/// </remarks>
public void Nudge()
{
//
// One pending wake-up is all a loop can act on. A second one would only make it run again
// with the same answer.
//
if (this.wakeUp.CurrentCount > 0)
return;
try
{
this.wakeUp.Release();
}
catch (SemaphoreFullException)
{
//
// Two threads got past the check above at the same time. The one which won left the
// wake-up we wanted, so there is nothing left to do here.
//
}
catch (ObjectDisposedException)
{
// The tracker is going away, and a number nobody will look at needs no update.
}
}
private async Task RunAsync()
{
var token = this.stopping.Token;
while (!token.IsCancellationRequested)
{
try
{
//
// Sleeps until somebody nudges -- or until the heartbeat is due, which is what the
// timeout returning false means. Both lead to the same run, so the result is not
// even looked at.
//
await this.wakeUp.WaitAsync(heartbeat, token);
if (token.IsCancellationRequested)
return;
//
// Deliberately without draining further wake-ups first. A nudge which arrives while
// this run reads the conversation may well be about a change this run is already
// seeing -- and then the extra run costs a few lookups. Draining would risk the
// other case, where the change comes after the read and nobody asks again.
//
try
{
await recount(token);
}
catch (Exception) when (!token.IsCancellationRequested)
{
//
// One failed run must not end the loop: a tracker which died on a single bad
// answer would leave a stale number standing forever, which is the failure this
// class was built to rule out. Saying what went wrong is the job of the work
// itself, which is the only side that has a logger.
//
}
//
// The quiet time is kept after the work, not before it: the first nudge of a burst
// is answered at once, and the rest of the burst collapses into the single run which
// follows this delay.
//
// It is also what paces a run which feeds itself. Showing a new number renders, and
// a render nudges -- so while something changes continuously, this delay is the
// whole cadence.
//
await Task.Delay(quietTime(), token);
}
catch (OperationCanceledException)
{
return;
}
catch (ObjectDisposedException)
{
// The tracker was disposed underneath this loop, which is another way of stopping.
return;
}
}
}
#region Implementation of IAsyncDisposable
public async ValueTask DisposeAsync()
{
await this.stopping.CancelAsync();
if (this.loop is not null)
{
try
{
//
// Awaited rather than abandoned, so that nothing is still counting into a component
// which is already gone. The counting itself takes the same token, so a run which
// sits in an IPC call ends with it -- and the patience is there for the case where
// it does not, because a chat being closed is not worth hanging on to.
//
await this.loop.WaitAsync(SHUTDOWN_PATIENCE);
}
catch (Exception)
{
// The loop ends on cancellation; whatever else it carries out is of no use here.
}
}
this.stopping.Dispose();
this.wakeUp.Dispose();
}
#endregion
}