AI-Studio/app/MindWork AI Studio/Settings/ProviderExtensions.cs
2026-09-12 14:22:21 +02:00

111 lines
5.9 KiB
C#

using AIStudio.Models;
using AIStudio.Models.Registry;
using AIStudio.Provider;
namespace AIStudio.Settings;
public static partial class ProviderExtensions
{
/// <summary>
/// Everything the app knows about the model this provider instance is configured with.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// The one door to that question. Behind it stand the links of the chain, in the order they
/// win: what the person said about their own installation, then what the rules worked out from
/// the name, then what the app assumes when nothing else said anything.
/// </remarks>
/// <param name="provider">The configured provider.</param>
/// <returns>The profile of the configured model.</returns>
public static ModelProfile GetModelProfile(this Provider provider)
{
var stated = provider.UsedLLMProvider.GetModelProfile(provider.Model);
return provider.CapabilityOverrides?.ApplyTo(stated) ?? stated;
}
/// <summary>
/// Everything the rules know about a model at a provider, without anybody's own settings.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// What the expert dialog shows next to each switch as the automatic answer, so that a person
/// can see what they are overriding.
///
/// The assumed profile fills in where no rule stated a single capability. It fills in the
/// capabilities only: a modifier may well have said what the model is made for without any rule
/// saying what it can do, and an embedding model nobody wrote a rule for stays an embedding
/// model rather than turning into a chat model with an assumption attached.
/// </remarks>
/// <param name="provider">The LLM provider the model is reached through.</param>
/// <param name="model">The model, named the way that provider names it.</param>
/// <returns>The profile, which knows nothing when there is nothing to reach.</returns>
public static ModelProfile GetModelProfile(this LLMProviders provider, Model model)
{
//
// Without a provider there is nothing to reach the model through, and an empty name is what
// a provider reports before anybody picked one. Neither is a model we could assume anything
// about, so neither gets the assumption.
//
if (provider is LLMProviders.NONE || string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(model.Id))
return ModelProfile.UNKNOWN;
var stated = ModelRegistry.Shared.Profile(provider, model.Id);
return stated.Capabilities is Capability.NONE
? stated with { Capabilities = ModelProfile.ASSUMED.Capabilities }
: stated;
}
/// <summary>
/// Get whether the model used by the configured provider accepts images as input.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// Two capabilities express image input, one for a single image and one for several. Anything that
/// wants to know whether an image may be sent has to accept both, which is why the question is asked
/// here instead of at each call site: attaching a file and validating an already attached file must
/// never disagree about it.
/// </remarks>
/// <param name="provider">The configured provider.</param>
/// <returns><c>true</c> when the model accepts image input.</returns>
public static bool SupportsImageInput(this Provider provider) => provider.GetModelProfile().HasAny(Capability.SINGLE_IMAGE_INPUT | Capability.MULTIPLE_IMAGE_INPUT);
/// <summary>
/// Checks whether this model can be used for chatting.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// What a model can do and what it is made for used to be two questions answered by two pieces
/// of code, each walking the same name with rules of its own. They disagreed: a model like
/// nomic-embed-text was an embedding model at one provider and a chat model at the next. Both
/// come out of the same rules now, which is why this takes the provider -- the same name means
/// different things depending on who serves it, and only the provider knows how to unwrap it.
///
/// The direction of the answer is deliberate. Everything not recognized as something else is a
/// chat model, so a provider adding a family we have never seen keeps it visible to the person
/// paying for it. Getting it wrong the other way would hide a model.
/// </remarks>
/// <param name="model">The model to check.</param>
/// <param name="provider">The provider serving it.</param>
/// <returns>True, when the model is a chat model or when we recognize no other kind.</returns>
public static bool IsChatModel(this Model model, LLMProviders provider) => provider.GetModelProfile(model).Kind is ModelKind.CHAT;
/// <summary>
/// Checks whether this model creates embeddings.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="model">The model to check.</param>
/// <param name="provider">The provider serving it.</param>
/// <returns>True, when the model is an embedding model.</returns>
public static bool IsEmbeddingModel(this Model model, LLMProviders provider) => provider.GetModelProfile(model).Kind is ModelKind.EMBEDDING;
/// <summary>
/// Checks whether this model transcribes audio.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="model">The model to check.</param>
/// <param name="provider">The provider serving it.</param>
/// <returns>True, when the model is a transcription model.</returns>
public static bool IsTranscriptionModel(this Model model, LLMProviders provider) => provider.GetModelProfile(model).Kind is ModelKind.TRANSCRIPTION;
/// <summary>
/// Checks whether this model generates images.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="model">The model to check.</param>
/// <param name="provider">The provider serving it.</param>
/// <returns>True, when the model is an image generation model.</returns>
public static bool IsImageModel(this Model model, LLMProviders provider) => provider.GetModelProfile(model).Kind is ModelKind.IMAGE_GENERATION;
}