mirror of
https://github.com/MindWorkAI/AI-Studio.git
synced 2026-10-05 02:09:40 +00:00
Hardened background work against disconnected circuits (#937)
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
99089f853e
commit
f03c2d1c88
44 files changed
+500
-126
No files matched your search
@@ -1,16 +1,121 @@
|
||||
using AIStudio.Assistants;
|
||||
using AIStudio.Tools.Services;
|
||||
|
||||
namespace AIStudio.Tools;
|
||||
|
||||
public static class JsRuntimeExtensions
|
||||
{
|
||||
private static readonly ILogger LOGGER = Program.LOGGER_FACTORY.CreateLogger(nameof(JsRuntimeExtensions));
|
||||
|
||||
public static async Task GenerateAndShowDiff(this IJSRuntime jsRuntime, string text1, string text2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
await jsRuntime.InvokeVoidAsync("generateDiff", text1, text2, AssistantLowerBase.RESULT_DIV_ID, AssistantLowerBase.BEFORE_RESULT_DIV_ID);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
public static async Task ClearDiv(this IJSRuntime jsRuntime, string divId)
|
||||
{
|
||||
await jsRuntime.InvokeVoidAsync("clearDiv", divId);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// <summary>
|
||||
/// Calls a JavaScript function which returns nothing, and tolerates a circuit which is already gone.
|
||||
/// </summary>
|
||||
/// <remarks>
|
||||
/// Blazor cannot issue JS interop calls once the browser connection of a circuit is gone. That happens
|
||||
/// during every reload and while a component gets disposed, so the failure is expected rather than
|
||||
/// exceptional. Discarding such a call is not an option, though: the discarded task keeps the fault
|
||||
/// until the finalizer reports it as an unobserved task exception, without any hint at its origin.
|
||||
/// This method is the one place which knows how to await such a call and what to do with its failure.
|
||||
/// </remarks>
|
||||
/// <param name="jsRuntime">The JS runtime to call.</param>
|
||||
/// <param name="identifier">The name of the JavaScript function.</param>
|
||||
/// <param name="args">The arguments for the JavaScript function.</param>
|
||||
/// <returns>True when the browser ran the function. Callers which remember what they told the browser
|
||||
/// must check this: a call which never arrived leaves the browser in its previous state.</returns>
|
||||
public static async ValueTask<bool> TryInvokeVoidAsync(this IJSRuntime jsRuntime, string identifier, params object?[]? args)
|
||||
{
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
await jsRuntime.InvokeVoidAsync(identifier, args);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
catch (Exception exception)
|
||||
{
|
||||
LogInvocationFailure(exception, identifier);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// <summary>
|
||||
/// Calls a JavaScript function which returns nothing, unless the circuit is known to be disconnected.
|
||||
/// </summary>
|
||||
/// <remarks>
|
||||
/// Prefer this over the variant without a circuit state wherever the caller knows its circuit. While a
|
||||
/// browser connection is gone, every single call would otherwise throw, which is needless work for
|
||||
/// something we already know cannot succeed — a component of a disconnected circuit which keeps
|
||||
/// rendering would produce one such exception per render.
|
||||
/// </remarks>
|
||||
/// <param name="jsRuntime">The JS runtime to call.</param>
|
||||
/// <param name="circuitState">The circuit of the caller.</param>
|
||||
/// <param name="identifier">The name of the JavaScript function.</param>
|
||||
/// <param name="args">The arguments for the JavaScript function.</param>
|
||||
/// <returns>True when the browser ran the function, false when it was skipped or failed.</returns>
|
||||
public static async ValueTask<bool> TryInvokeVoidAsync(this IJSRuntime jsRuntime, CircuitStateService circuitState, string identifier, params object?[]? args)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!circuitState.IsConnected)
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOGGER.LogDebug("The JS call '{Identifier}' was skipped because the browser connection of the circuit '{CircuitId}' is down.", identifier, circuitState.CircuitId);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return await jsRuntime.TryInvokeVoidAsync(identifier, args);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// <summary>
|
||||
/// Calls a function of a JavaScript module which returns nothing, and tolerates a circuit which is
|
||||
/// already gone. See the remarks on the JS runtime variant of this method.
|
||||
/// </summary>
|
||||
/// <param name="module">The JavaScript module to call.</param>
|
||||
/// <param name="identifier">The name of the function inside the module.</param>
|
||||
/// <param name="args">The arguments for the function.</param>
|
||||
/// <returns>True when the browser ran the function, false when it failed.</returns>
|
||||
public static async ValueTask<bool> TryInvokeVoidAsync(this IJSObjectReference module, string identifier, params object?[]? args)
|
||||
{
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
await module.InvokeVoidAsync(identifier, args);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
catch (Exception exception)
|
||||
{
|
||||
LogInvocationFailure(exception, identifier);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private static void LogInvocationFailure(Exception exception, string identifier)
|
||||
{
|
||||
switch (exception)
|
||||
{
|
||||
//
|
||||
// The circuit is disconnected or disposed, or the call was canceled while it was on its way.
|
||||
// None of this is a defect: it is what a reload, a lost connection, or a disposed component
|
||||
// looks like from here.
|
||||
//
|
||||
case JSDisconnectedException:
|
||||
case ObjectDisposedException:
|
||||
case OperationCanceledException:
|
||||
LOGGER.LogDebug("The JS call '{Identifier}' was not completed because the browser connection was gone: {Reason}", identifier, exception.Message);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
// The call reached the browser, but failed there. That is worth knowing about:
|
||||
case JSException:
|
||||
LOGGER.LogWarning(exception, "The JS call '{Identifier}' failed in the browser.", identifier);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
default:
|
||||
LOGGER.LogError(exception, "The JS call '{Identifier}' failed unexpectedly.", identifier);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user