Resolve model profiles through the registry

app/MindWork AI Studio/Models/Baidu/ErnieFamily.cs

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+using static AIStudio.Provider.Capability;
+
+namespace AIStudio.Models.Baidu;
+
+/// <summary>
+/// ERNIE, from Baidu.
+/// </summary>
+/// <remarks>
+/// The line calls functions and the thinking checkpoints keep the channel open whatever the request
+/// says. The vision checkpoints are the exception, and the reason this family is written down at
+/// all: they run in a thinking and a non-thinking mode, and tool calling is not documented for them.
+/// Left to the assumption they would be offered tools nobody has said they can use.
+///
+/// The vision rule wins over the thinking rule by the latter stepping aside rather than by being
+/// less specific: ERNIE ships a checkpoint which is both, and two rules claiming it with the same
+/// right would be a coin toss.
+/// </remarks>
+public sealed class ErnieFamily : ModelFamily
+{
+    /// <inheritdoc />
+    public override ModelVendor Vendor => ModelVendor.BAIDU;
+
+    /// <inheritdoc />
+    public override ModelSource Source => new("https://ernie.baidu.com/blog/", new DateOnly(2026, 9, 12), "Ported unchanged from the ERNIE block of ProviderExtensions.OpenSource.cs.");
+
+    /// <inheritdoc />
+    protected override void Declare(ModelFamilyBuilder builder)
+    {
+        builder.Rule("ernie").AsSubstring()
+            .Capabilities(TEXT_INPUT | TEXT_OUTPUT | FUNCTION_CALLING)
+            .Apis(CHAT_COMPLETION_API);
+
+        builder.Rule("ernie").AsSubstring().AlsoContains("thinking").NotContains("vl").Inherits()
+            .Reasoning(ReasoningSupport.ALWAYS);
+
+        builder.Rule("ernie").AsSubstring().AlsoContains("vl")
+            .Capabilities(TEXT_INPUT | MULTIPLE_IMAGE_INPUT | TEXT_OUTPUT)
+            .Apis(CHAT_COMPLETION_API)
+            .Reasoning(ReasoningSupport.OPTIONAL);
+    }
+}

app/MindWork AI Studio/Models/ModelProfile.cs

@@ -37,6 +37,31 @@ public readonly record struct ModelProfile
     /// </remarks>
     public static readonly ModelProfile UNKNOWN = new();
 
+    /// <summary>
+    /// What the app assumes about a model when no rule says anything about it.
+    /// </summary>
+    /// <remarks>
+    /// Hugging Face alone carries more than a hundred thousand models, so falling through here is
+    /// the normal case rather than a gap somebody forgot to close. The assumption describes what an
+    /// instruction-tuned model of the last few years does: it reads and writes text, it speaks the
+    /// chat completion API, and it calls functions.
+    ///
+    /// Tool calling is the part that was weighed rather than observed. Counted over the corpus, 17
+    /// of the models which reach this answer would be described wrongly without it and 8 with it --
+    /// and those 8 are named, in WithoutToolCallingFamily. A model that is offered tools it cannot
+    /// use fails visibly, and the person turns tool calling off in the expert settings; a model
+    /// that is never offered any fails invisibly, because nothing ever asks it. On top of that, a
+    /// model released from here on is far more likely to call functions than not.
+    ///
+    /// This is the whole assumption. Everything else stays unknown on purpose: a context window
+    /// nobody stated is not 4096 tokens, and a model whose name says nothing about images does not
+    /// get image input for free -- that is what the expert settings and the model plugins are for.
+    /// </remarks>
+    public static readonly ModelProfile ASSUMED = new()
+    {
+        Capabilities = Capability.TEXT_INPUT | Capability.TEXT_OUTPUT | Capability.CHAT_COMPLETION_API | Capability.FUNCTION_CALLING,
+    };
+
     /// <summary>
     /// What the model can do.
     /// </summary>

app/MindWork AI Studio/Models/ServiceNow/AprielFamily.cs

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+using static AIStudio.Provider.Capability;
+
+namespace AIStudio.Models.ServiceNow;
+
+/// <summary>
+/// Apriel, from ServiceNow.
+/// </summary>
+/// <remarks>
+/// The Thinker models see, and they always reason: their default chat template opens the thinking
+/// channel, so there is nothing to switch on and nothing to switch off.
+///
+/// This family exists although the line is a small one, and the reason is the tool tokens. They
+/// arrived with 1.6; 1.5 has none. Left to the assumption, 1.5 would be offered tools it cannot
+/// use -- which is the one direction the switch-over must not take, because nobody decided it and
+/// nothing would show it until a request comes back as an error.
+/// </remarks>
+public sealed class AprielFamily : ModelFamily
+{
+    /// <inheritdoc />
+    public override ModelVendor Vendor => ModelVendor.SERVICE_NOW;
+
+    /// <inheritdoc />
+    public override ModelSource Source => new("https://huggingface.co/ServiceNow-AI/Apriel-1.5-15b-Thinker", new DateOnly(2026, 9, 12), "Ported unchanged from the Apriel block of ProviderExtensions.OpenSource.cs.");
+
+    /// <inheritdoc />
+    protected override void Declare(ModelFamilyBuilder builder)
+    {
+        builder.Rule("apriel").AsSubstring()
+            .Capabilities(TEXT_INPUT | MULTIPLE_IMAGE_INPUT | TEXT_OUTPUT | FUNCTION_CALLING)
+            .Apis(CHAT_COMPLETION_API)
+            .Reasoning(ReasoningSupport.ALWAYS);
+
+        builder.Rule("apriel-1.5").AsSubstring().Inherits()
+            .Removes(FUNCTION_CALLING);
+    }
+}

app/MindWork AI Studio/Settings/ProviderCapabilityOverrides.cs

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 using System.Text;
 using System.Text.Json.Serialization;
 
+using AIStudio.Models;
 using AIStudio.Provider;
 
 using Lua;
@@ -15,6 +16,23 @@ namespace AIStudio.Settings;
 /// </summary>
 public sealed record ProviderCapabilityOverrides
 {
+    /// <summary>
+    /// The capabilities a person switches on or off directly, without the reasoning words.
+    /// </summary>
+    /// <remarks>
+    /// How a model reasons is one answer out of four, not three flags which can contradict each
+    /// other, so it is resolved on its own below. The three words stay in the list above because
+    /// that is the vocabulary a settings file and a configuration plugin are written in.
+    /// </remarks>
+    private static readonly IReadOnlyList<Capability> DIRECTLY_SETTABLE_CAPABILITIES =
+    [
+        Capability.AUDIO_INPUT,
+        Capability.FUNCTION_CALLING,
+        Capability.MULTIPLE_IMAGE_INPUT,
+        Capability.SPEECH_INPUT,
+        Capability.VIDEO_INPUT,
+    ];
+
     private static readonly IReadOnlyList<Capability> SUPPORTED_CAPABILITIES =
     [
         Capability.AUDIO_INPUT,
@@ -96,6 +114,85 @@ public sealed record ProviderCapabilityOverrides
         _ => this
     };
 
+    /// <summary>
+    /// Applies what a person said about their own installation to what the rules worked out.
+    /// </summary>
+    /// <remarks>
+    /// The topmost link of the chain: an explicit statement about one's own provider wins over
+    /// everything the rules could know, because the person can see the installation and the rules
+    /// cannot.
+    /// </remarks>
+    /// <param name="profile">What the rules worked out.</param>
+    /// <returns>The profile as this provider instance was told it is.</returns>
+    public ModelProfile ApplyTo(in ModelProfile profile) => profile with
+    {
+        Capabilities = this.ApplyToCapabilities(profile.Capabilities),
+        Reasoning = this.ResolveReasoning(profile.Reasoning),
+    };
+
+    /// <summary>
+    /// Switches the plain capabilities on and off.
+    /// </summary>
+    /// <param name="stated">What the rules worked out.</param>
+    /// <returns>The capabilities after the overrides.</returns>
+    private Capability ApplyToCapabilities(Capability stated)
+    {
+        var capabilities = stated;
+        foreach (var capability in DIRECTLY_SETTABLE_CAPABILITIES)
+            switch (this.GetOverride(capability))
+            {
+                case true:
+                    capabilities |= capability;
+                    break;
+
+                case false:
+                    capabilities &= ~capability;
+                    break;
+            }
+
+        return capabilities;
+    }
+
+    /// <summary>
+    /// Works out how a model reasons, out of what the rules say and what a person said.
+    /// </summary>
+    /// <remarks>
+    /// This replaces thirty lines which repaired states that could not exist -- a model both always
+    /// reasoning and reasoning on request -- by an answer which cannot be in two of them at once.
+    /// The expert dialog writes all three words together, so the five combinations it produces are
+    /// answered exactly as they are today.
+    ///
+    /// One thing changes, and it is a defect going away. A word nobody said anything about used to
+    /// destroy the answer: a provider carrying any override at all, say tool calling turned off, lost
+    /// "reasoning on by default" on the way through, because the old repair took the word away unless
+    /// "reasoning on request" stood next to it -- which no rule ever states. Here a "no" only takes
+    /// away what it names.
+    /// </remarks>
+    /// <param name="stated">How the rules say the model reasons.</param>
+    /// <returns>How it reasons after the overrides.</returns>
+    private ReasoningSupport ResolveReasoning(ReasoningSupport stated)
+    {
+        // A "yes" is the whole answer, whatever else is written next to it:
+        if (this.AlwaysReasoning is true)
+            return ReasoningSupport.ALWAYS;
+
+        if (this.ReasoningByDefault is true)
+            return ReasoningSupport.ON_BY_DEFAULT;
+
+        if (this.OptionalReasoning is true)
+            return ReasoningSupport.OPTIONAL;
+
+        // A "no" only contradicts the state it names:
+        return stated switch
+        {
+            ReasoningSupport.ALWAYS => this.AlwaysReasoning is false ? ReasoningSupport.NONE : ReasoningSupport.ALWAYS,
+            ReasoningSupport.ON_BY_DEFAULT => this.ReasoningByDefault is false || this.OptionalReasoning is false ? ReasoningSupport.NONE : ReasoningSupport.ON_BY_DEFAULT,
+            ReasoningSupport.OPTIONAL => this.OptionalReasoning is false ? ReasoningSupport.NONE : ReasoningSupport.OPTIONAL,
+
+            _ => ReasoningSupport.NONE,
+        };
+    }
+
     public List<Capability> ApplyTo(IEnumerable<Capability> automaticCapabilities)
     {
         var mergedCapabilities = automaticCapabilities.Distinct().ToList();

app/MindWork AI Studio/Settings/ProviderExtensions.cs

@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
-using AIStudio.Provider;
+using AIStudio.Models;
+using AIStudio.Models.Registry;
+using AIStudio.Provider;
 using AIStudio.Provider.HuggingFace;
 
 namespace AIStudio.Settings;
@@ -69,6 +71,53 @@ public static partial class ProviderExtensions
         return new string(normalized[..length]);
     }
 
+    /// <summary>
+    /// Everything the app knows about the model this provider instance is configured with.
+    /// </summary>
+    /// <remarks>
+    /// The one door to that question. Behind it stand the links of the chain, in the order they
+    /// win: what the person said about their own installation, then what the rules worked out from
+    /// the name, then what the app assumes when nothing else said anything.
+    /// </remarks>
+    /// <param name="provider">The configured provider.</param>
+    /// <returns>The profile of the configured model.</returns>
+    public static ModelProfile GetModelProfile(this Provider provider)
+    {
+        var stated = provider.UsedLLMProvider.GetModelProfile(provider.Model);
+        return provider.CapabilityOverrides?.ApplyTo(stated) ?? stated;
+    }
+
+    /// <summary>
+    /// Everything the rules know about a model at a provider, without anybody's own settings.
+    /// </summary>
+    /// <remarks>
+    /// What the expert dialog shows next to each switch as the automatic answer, so that a person
+    /// can see what they are overriding.
+    ///
+    /// The assumed profile fills in where no rule stated a single capability. It fills in the
+    /// capabilities only: a modifier may well have said what the model is made for without any rule
+    /// saying what it can do, and an embedding model nobody wrote a rule for stays an embedding
+    /// model rather than turning into a chat model with an assumption attached.
+    /// </remarks>
+    /// <param name="provider">The LLM provider the model is reached through.</param>
+    /// <param name="model">The model, named the way that provider names it.</param>
+    /// <returns>The profile, which knows nothing when there is nothing to reach.</returns>
+    public static ModelProfile GetModelProfile(this LLMProviders provider, Model model)
+    {
+        //
+        // Without a provider there is nothing to reach the model through, and an empty name is what
+        // a provider reports before anybody picked one. Neither is a model we could assume anything
+        // about, so neither gets the assumption.
+        //
+        if (provider is LLMProviders.NONE || string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(model.Id))
+            return ModelProfile.UNKNOWN;
+
+        var stated = ModelRegistry.Shared.Profile(provider, model.Id);
+        return stated.Capabilities is Capability.NONE
+            ? stated with { Capabilities = ModelProfile.ASSUMED.Capabilities }
+            : stated;
+    }
+
     /// <summary>
     /// Get the capabilities of the model used by the configured provider.
     /// </summary>